TRAVESTY JUSTICE

3 Jan
1

TRAVESTY JUSTICE


This is truly unacceptable that state party in question are unable to redress a TRAVESTY JUSTICE on a refugee procedural process against the 1951 Geneva convention and it applicable protocols we’re the state supposedly the state of protection and her agent used a persecutory state and her agent of persecution as a source of information against a refugee applicant, Thus resulting in a vacation of legitimate international protection status, In violation of the Optional Protocols on Civil and Political Rights, Under whatever circumstances, any government with true intent to redress this unjustified TRAVESTY JUSTICE and noncompliance of international covenant should have reviewed the communication. As such
Ekens Foundation is committed to endeavor on the fight for justice for those refugees and asylum seekers both pre and post-deportation,
Thanks
Considering that in order to achieve the purposes of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights hereinafter referred to as the Covenant, The implementation of its provisions should have been appropriate perfected as provided in the present Protocol in accord to Article 1, which abide the State Party to recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications from individuals subject to its jurisdiction who claim to be victims of a of human rights violation set forth in the Covenant,
Subject to the provisions of article 1, individuals who claim that any of their rights enumerated in the Covenant have been violated and who have exhausted all available domestic remedies may submit a written communication to the Committee for consideration.
Following the Article 3, That the Committee shall consider inadmissible of any communication under the present Protocol which is anonymous, or which it considers to be an abuse of the right of submission, That such communications to be irreconcilable with the provisions of the Covenant on which the committee has given six months to receive State written explanations or statements clarifying the matter and the remedy, if any have been taken by that State on a matter not being examined under another procedure of international investigation, and on a matter which the individual has exhausted all available domestic remedies, considering that committee has issued an Interim measures


Categorised in:
shubskaya says:

Those who plead their cause in the absence of an opponent can invent to their heart’s content, can pontificate without taking into account the opposite point of view and keep the best arguments for themselves, for aggressors are always quick to attack those who have no means of defence

ekensfoundation.com/.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Verified by MonsterInsights