TRAVESTY JUSTICE
This is truly unacceptable that state party in question are unable to redress a TRAVESTY JUSTICE on a refugee procedural process against the 1951 Geneva ...
Read News Updates
Refugee Hearing
This is the information you need to know if you are waiting for your refugees and asylum hearing notice to appear The RPD will send you a Notice ...
Become Volunteer
Volunteer by Getting Involved, We are currently recruiting international volunteers who would coordinate for our programmes in their local communities in various countries on refugees ...
New Immigration Prison
Join our call for action against the new immigrant’s prison in Laval Quebec Canada to commence soon. Between November 23rd and Dec 7th, we are ...
Daylight Kidnapping Elderly Woman Austrian City According to the Austrian Police,
The Initial details of the reported daylight kidnapping of an elderly woman with links to Austro-Hungarian nobility made the apparent abduction in a small Austrian ...
THE TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE, THE SYSTEMATIC OPPRESSION, THE REPRISAL ACTION FROM THE STATE PARTY AGAINST A REFUGEE CLAIMANT IN VIOLATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL NORMS
The 11 Years of Government lack of competence of redress to a Travesty of Justice Against a Refugees Claimant on Particular Case
It is unacceptable that state party in question are unable to redress a TRAVESTY JUSTICE on a refugee procedural process against the 1951 Geneva convention and it applicable protocols we’re the state supposedly the state of protection and her agent used a persecutory state and her agent of persecution as a source of information against a refugee applicant, Thus resulting in a vacation of legitimate international protection status, In violation of the Optional Protocols on Civil and Political Rights, Under whatever circumstances,
Any government with true intent to redress this unjustified TRAVESTY JUSTICE and noncompliance of international covenant should have reviewed the communication. As such Ekens Foundation is committed to endeavor on the fight for justice for those refugees and asylum seekers both pre and post-deportation,
Considering that in order to achieve the purposes of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights hereinafter referred to as the Covenant, The implementation of its provisions should have been appropriate perfected as provided in the present Protocol in accord to Article 1, which abide the State Party to recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications from individuals subject to its jurisdiction who claim to be victims of a of human rights violation set forth in the Covenant
Subject to the provisions of article 1, individuals who claim that any of their rights enumerated in the Covenant have been violated and who have exhausted all available domestic remedies may submit a written communication to the Committee for consideration.
Following Article 3,
That the Committee shall consider inadmissible of any communication under the present Protocol which is anonymous, or which it considers to be an abuse of the right of submission, That such communications to be irreconcilable with the provisions of the Covenant on which the committee has given six months to receive State written explanations or statements clarifying the matter and the remedy,
If any have been taken by that State on a matter not being examined under another procedure of international investigation, and on a matter which the individual has exhausted all available domestic remedies, considering that committee has issued an Interim measures
Thus, the International oversight agencies like the (UNHCR) (RefWord) (Amnesty International) and all the rest have in this case shown their lack of dependency while they are unable to separate themselves from influence and interference of their host country
